Skimming Stone 4.06ct Line Bracelet in 18ct Yellow Gold

Close

Emerald Cut, Claw Set

£ 28,200
Add to Bag
Style it with
Pragnell Seal. Handcrafted in Great Britain.
Add to Bag

Description


Perfectly complemented by contemporary bold 18ct yellow gold surrounds ten shimmering emerald cut diamonds (4.06cts) have been expertly claw set commanding attention as they elegantly encircle the wrist. Designed by a member of the Pragnell family to give the classic tennis bracelet a new look the strong lines of each emerald cut diamond have been expertly softened by tactile rounded rectangular surrounds. Further openwork rectangular links join each diamond set element together forming a supremely comfortable and wearable bracelet (18cm). As a sixth-generation family jeweller the Pragnell family often gain inspiration from Stratford Upon Avon and its beautiful surroundings. In this instance childhood memories skimming stones on the Avon were evoked, providing the perfect inspiration for this refreshing contemporary style. Handcrafted in our workshops in the heart of England our designs offer the superb quality of the Pragnell Seal, and showcase exceptional artistry, craftsmanship and gemstones.

Read more

Specifications


Collection Skimming Stone
Material Yellow Gold
Principal Stone Diamond
Principal Stone Shape i Emerald
Princip Stone Weight i 0.40
Principal Dia Colour i Est G/H
Princip. Dia Clarity i VS
Total Weight i 4.06
Bracelet Length 18cm
Clasp Type Box
PRAGNELL REFERENCE 1101224
Read more
skimming stone mobile.png skimming stone mobile.png

Skimming Stone

This collection is the ultimate classic collection that will stand the test of time. Inspired by the simple beauty of nature, it showcases solitaire rings, pendants, drop earrings, tennis bracelets, and line necklaces.

Read more
This collection is the ultimate classic collection that will stand the test of time. Inspired by the simple beauty of nature, it showcases solitaire rings, pendants, drop earrings, tennis bracelets, and line necklaces.
SHOP THE COLLECTION

The Pragnell Difference